Please Note:

Although this blog is intelligent and informative, with an accuracy that's on par with Wikipedia, you may indeed notice that there are both spelling and grammatical errors sprinkled throughout the posts. That is because this blog is unedited and spontaneous, and it is always moving forward. If either of you who actually read it are bothered by the imperfections, let me know and I'll send you the password to edit it.
Happy Reading to you both.

Friday, September 17, 2010

Face Book Rant On Domestic Violence Fraud

What you are about to read is a revamped version of a personal blog, written a week ago. It was rewritten in order to lighten the tone, as it was mentioned that my rant was too much like a rant. While I can not deny my passion when it comes to false accusations and the overall policies in place regarding domestic abuse, it is not my intention to sound insensitive toward battered women. At the same time, I refuse to give the issue the same dire as some. Many feminist groups make men out to be like neanderthals stomping around and dragging women by the hair. They paint women to be innocent souls, helpless and without choice, and they absolutely denounce the "myth" that women may lie. I find that laughable.

Let's say some six foot dude decides to punch Snookie in the face at a bar, she's hurt; it's terrible, and that guy will be punished ten fold, beelieeeve me! OK, that guy was on camera(moron!), but if it were somewhere private, then what?

OK, for that I say women should be allowed to carry mace and if they feel threatened....mace away. It's good enough for security guards who are asked to stop a crime in progress; it should suffice for a woman against one man. (Fellas who may be saying, "Whoa!", trust me when I say that a shot of mace from a pissed off girl is nothing compared to what they can do now. The only difference is, instead of pushing one button, today they have to push three.

Now, if that six foot man is DATING Snookie and hits her in the mouth, then we have a different situation. Now, they may be in a house. Well, the mace works just as good indoors. It should be enough to get you out of the house, if you are REALLY in danger.

What i mean is that if you are in danger, you should think about getting away, only. Those poor helpless women also shouldn't be "engaging" their attacker, scratching, clawing...(That is, they shouldn't don't jump on their man's back or slap him in the face and then later on get a picture taken for the battered women posters looking like a little school girl with a shiner and a fat lip, in front of an ambulance with the siren on like they are going into emergency traction.) Do you not see the propaganda?

So, anyway get free for a moment to get out of the house. I reiterate; the mace will allow you that luxury. Ask any corrections officer, because that is exactly what they are armed with in order to stop prison riots. I believe it will subdue a raging husband. Most regular guys are out of shape. Many get tired putting on socks, and believe me, beating someone is tiring. Unless the woman happens to be with a wife beating mixed martial artist, in which case you should have some supped up mace shooter. (CO2 or something)
**Again, dudes, just take the shit! If she has to mace you, you are either beating her, you said or did some STUPID shit, or you picked a viciously psychotic chick, probably with borderline personality, ehem)

On the other hand, there are some instances, believe it or not, where the woman just may have been at fault. For example, you can not just jump in the bed you guys share with his best friend, LaRon, and think that there will be no repercussions. Perhaps, you and LeRon should have discussed strategies before you started destroying this man's heart. (Of course, I am not implying that ALL battered women ask for it. I say this because that is a clever tactic used by those who know they have no argument. they will latch on to one sentence such as that and misconstrue it. That is how they operate, and the reason why we are here right now.)

Also, if you are a woman who's dating a roid monster, lifting weights and watching Scarface or the Big Pun documentary or something, and you don't have your mace and a clear exit plan, don't do anything stupid. Don't bust his chops, slap him in the face, tell him you screwed his friend and it's over and that he has a small penis or anything else. Don't say or do things that you KNOW really gets his goose. Come on, think, women. That is not to say you have to be a geisha, but this is your man. You should know him.

Can we at least TRY? No. instead they choose to hand women the power to annihilate a man's life. Take everything. You can see by the articles written, including THIS ONE, what i mean. The absolute injustice is seen and documented and written about, but as you see, NOTHING GETS DONE!!!

Ok, so we arm women with mace-based assault weapons to blast their dangerous husband, who's in boxers and a beer-stained tank-top, aka "wife beater", smokes two packs a day and is drunk enough to hit his woman in the first place, right in his face, slowing him up long enough to get out of their one bedroom flat. Again, prison riots>drunk husband.

In addition, we need to change a few rules and a few guidelines. After our brave little heroine makes her way out of the place, armed with her pepper spray/mace hybrid blaster, she is to make a formal complaint to the police department, at which time they do NOT dispatch two policeman to the home to grab this poor bum, who's probably passed out (because when you get hammered enough to attack your girlfriend, knowing she has a mace blaster, the next step is usually pass out in your own puke.) That policy where one spouse must be arrested wastes tax payer money, it's a process. It crowds jails and all that crap.

Instead they would have the poor thing fill out a ONE TIME "he hit me" complaint, which gets filed. An order of protection is put in place, meaning they can not come near each other, period. Period. If they are together and something happens then police get called and whoever wasn't there first does the jail thing. If it's a public place, people will know who was there. If they're alone in a house then somebody drove there and knocked on the door, and that person is screwed.Tough.

At that point, I have no pity. If you are the female who just escaped this guy and you go to where he is to engage him a second time. You deserve it! All men do not hit women. A small percentage of men beat women, probably the same as the percentage of women who will lie about it. So, IF a dude hits you so badly that you need the police force, the DA, the judge, the city council, the state government, the FBI, every charity group in the world and women's rights lobbyists to come to your aid and banish this man from society then DON'T GO BACK! LEAVE!

Here are some arguments I've heard are:

Well what if he has the money? I laugh at that. If you married a guy with money who beats you, who's fault is that? If he just started beating you when you got married, mace his ass the first time it happens, follow my protocol, and file for a divorce. Believe me, women own divorce court.

What if there are kids? Would you rather show your kids that it's ok for mommy to get beat up? You leave! Trust me again, you WILL get the kids.

What if he follows me? Following my protocol, the second is is near you after the report, he goes to jail.

But I love him? Then you love ALL of him. Deal with the abuse.

Anything else?

Now if he is stupid enough to go back to her, knowing he was already maced, he too deserves jail. If he is a psychotic stalker, jail sounds fine. Give women that power. Is that not enough???

Well, as you see, the idea is air tight in theory, but of course, it will never happen. That would be un-American to do something that made sense.

Something that we can do, HOWEVER, is this:

Make the crime of falsely accusing someone of domestic abuse just as serious as the domestic abuse. Sample said, in his piece in 1996, that there were no known cases of such a thing. Can you BELIEVE that shit? I can't. And here in 2010 it's the same thing. If there is no repercussion, what's to deter them from doing it?? So, we are giving these women Thor's hammer and Zeus' lightning bolts to protect themselves and to use at will? We give them a gun with no safety, to be fired on anyone at anytime with no libel whatsoever. If you kill an innocent man in the line of war, so be it.

WE DON'T EVEN EXTEND OUR SOLDIERS THAT COURTESY against foreign enemies, but we grant that right to women of all kinds and all mental states to exercise against U.S. citizens. (Oh, make no mistake about it, my man. It doesn't matter if you carried another wounded soldier off the battlefield to safety a month earlier, in the desert. If you are with a crazy chick, a BPD, bi-polar, drunk, or other, and she feels like bringing the ruckus, you soldier, are going to the clink. HooRaa!)

Congratulations, Women. You've come a long way, baby!

0 Please add your thoughts to the discussion.:

Post a Comment

Thanks for reading that. Please add some comments, give an opinion, ask questions, disagree. I would love a healthy discussion on this, not to find a winner in this debate, but to find the truth.

- Professor Plume

Wordpress Theme by wpthemescreator .
Converted To Blogger Template by Anshul .